NEPAPTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No.NR02475-13
26 November 2013
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 25 November 2013. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
In addition, the Board considered the
regulations and policies.
advisory opinions (A/O) furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps
(HQOMC) memo 1400/3 MMPR-2 of 22 Aug 2013 and HOMC memo 1070 MIQ
of 25 Jul 2013, copies of which have already been provided to
you on 21 October 2013. You were given 30 days to respond, and
failed to do so. Therefore, your case was presented to the
Board as is.
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In making this determination, the Board
substantially concurred with the comments contained in the
advisory opinions.
s been denied. The names and
Therefore, your application ha
nel will be furnished upon
votes of the members of the pa
request.
f your case are such
not be taken. You are entitled to have
decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
it is also important to keep in mind
the Board. In this regard,
that a presumption of reguiarity attaches to all official
It is regretted that the circumstances ©
that favorable action can
the Board reconsider its
Docket No.NRO2475-13
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
| : W. DEAN PFE
Executive Dire
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4871 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6112 13
BA three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7850 13
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket No.NROQ7850-13 official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2367 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when Docket No.NRO2367-15 applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5244 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6594 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in ‘support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 11370 12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. fn addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dated 25 June 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0929-13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO Memo 1050 Ser N130C/1300593 dated 25 June 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10116 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicabie statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 18 Dec 12 and CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N3 dtd 25 Apr 13,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2575-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, reguiations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 25 Jun 13, a copy of which is attached.